Madison’s version of the speech and press clauses, introduced in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, provided: “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” The special committee rewrote the language to some extent, adding other provisions from Madison’s draft, to make it read: “ The freedom of speech and of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to apply to the government for redress of grievances, shall not be infringed.” In this form it went to the Senate, which rewrote it to read: “That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Subsequently, the religion clauses and these clauses were combined by the Senate. The final language was agreed upon in conference.
Answer:
Please post a picture this makes no sense
Explanation:
I would probably go with the last option that one seems the most logical
Answer:
D) Cassius must decide whether or not to send his best friend into the camp.
Explanation:
After Pindarus approaches Cassius and Titinius to tell them that Antony is invading the tents and tries to persuade Cassius to escape, they realize there is a fire in the tents. So, Cassius decides to send Titinius to check out if the troops are allies or enemies.
The moral dilemma expressed in this excerpt is that if Titinius dies in the mission, Cassius will be responsible for it, and will have to live knowing that his best friend died because of him.
