During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the constitution while Federalist, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing his ides that the US is too larger to have only one central government, and the states should receive more power, which goes against the fact that the Constitution was created to provide order in the new country. As Madison prepares for office, the citizen of the US were most likely expecting him to be more open to the suggestion in his interpretations of the Constitution. However, the Federalist spoke on the behalf of the entire Federalist party, and a veto on internal improvements, Madison proves that he truly is not a loose constructionist as he party would have preferred him to be.
Answer:
First and foremost, a limited and smaller government is less expensive. The less we look to government to solve problems, the less we as taxpayers have to pay. We the people pay for these programs, including employee salaries and benefits.
Secondly, a smaller, limited government cuts down on waste, fraud and inefficiency. With so many agencies, how can anyone keep track of all that goes on? And with all the bureaucracy, how does anything even get done? Where is the accountability? And with all these agencies, departments and commissions, one can only imagine the duplication of services, not to mention the unnecessary ones.
Explanation:
<span>Trans Saharan trade route was conducted throughout a vast region between mediterranean countries and sub-saharan Africa.It was an important trading route commencing from 8th century to late 16th century. The establishment of trade interconnected the European to African empires of Ghana, Mali and Songhai, however traveling across the Sahara is difficult; transportation depended on camels.
The Golden age of Trans-Saharan trade ended with the collapse of Songhai empire after the Moroccan attack in 1591. Neverthless, the trade continued, until the railroads gave it the final death blow in the beginning of our century.</span>
I may not be correct but I believe that Martin Luther King implied that if they were to protest with violent it would only result in more violence as a retaliation by the government. So by doing peaceful protest the government didnt have an actual solid reason to attack them, so when the government did enact violence on them it caught the attention of people around the world.