No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
Both B and D took place, but if you had to choose one, it would be B. The technological advances made farming much more quicker and easier for a large piece of land.
The correct answer is Engaging in financial planning
Explanation: Financial planning is an instrument that helps to anticipate problems. It is often prepared with reference to the last annual balance sheet, in order not to repeat mistakes. Thus, new tools are thought to reduce costs and increase revenues.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "An appointed vice president assumed the presidency." A consequence of the Watergate scandal is that An appointed vice president <span>assumed the presidency.</span><span> </span>
Answer: pls dont ban me put i dont know
Explanation: