a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
The transformed function is G(x) = -4x² after applying the transformation stretched vertically and flipped over the x-axis option (C) G(x) = -4x² is correct.
<h3>What is a function?</h3>
It is defined as a special type of relationship, and they have a predefined domain and range according to the function every value in the domain is related to exactly one value in the range.
The options are missing.
The options are:
A. G(x) = 4x²
B. G(x) = -(1/4)x²
C. G(x) = -4x²
D. G(x) = (1/4)x²
We have an equation of a function F(x)
F(x) = x²
The transformation F(x) can be stretched vertically and flipped over the x-axis to produce the graph of G(x)
To stretch vertically if the function is multiplied by a constant value
f(x) = ax²
To flip over the x-axis if multiply by negative value.
g(x) = -ax²
From the options
G(x) = -4x²
Thus, the transformed function is G(x) = -4x² after applying the transformation stretched vertically and flipped over the x-axis option (C) G(x) = -4x² is correct.
Learn more about the function here:
brainly.com/question/5245372
#SPJ1
Hey there :) I'm pretty sure that your answer is D) ∠S ≅ <span>∠Y because corresponding angles of similar triangles are congruent.
I think that it is the answer because if you shift your paper around, and look at the angles from different views, you can tell that angles S and Y are congruent, or the same, because of the way that both angles are at the end of the longer sides of both triangles.
So, your answer is D!
~Hope this helped!~</span>
Since we are already given the amount of jumps from the first trial, and how much it should be increased by on each succeeding trial, we can already solve for the amount of jumps from the first through tenth trials. Starting from 5 and adding 3 each time, we get: 5 8 (11) 14 17 20 23 26 29 32, with 11 being the third trial.
Having been provided 2 different sigma notations, which I assume are choices to the question, we can substitute the initial value to see if it does match the result of the 3rd trial which we obtained by manual adding.
Let us try it below:
Sigma notation 1:
10
<span> Σ (2i + 3)
</span>i = 3
@ i = 3
2(3) + 3
12
The first sigma notation does not have the same result, so we move on to the next.
10
<span> Σ (3i + 2)
</span><span>i = 3
</span>
When i = 3; <span>3(3) + 2 = 11. (OK)
</span>
Since the 3rd trial is a match, we test it with the other values for the 4th through 10th trials.
When i = 4; <span>3(4) + 2 = 14. (OK)
</span>When i = 5; <span>3(5) + 2 = 17. (OK)
</span>When i = 6; <span>3(6) + 2 = 20. (OK)
</span>When i = 7; 3(7) + 2 = 23. (OK)
When i = 8; <span>3(8) + 2 = 26. (OK)
</span>When i = 9; <span>3(9) + 2 = 29. (OK)
</span>When i = 10; <span>3(10) + 2 = 32. (OK)
Adding the results from her 3rd through 10th trials: </span><span>11 + 14 + 17 + 20 + 23 + 26 + 29 + 32 = 172.
</span>
Therefore, the total jumps she had made from her third to tenth trips is 172.
answer:
a. scarf costs today = $6
b. scarf costs 3 days from now = $3
step-by-step explanation:
- 1/2 off means you would multiply the amount by 1/2 then subtract
a. original price of scarf: $12
12 X 1/2 = 6
12 - 6 = 6
— scarf costs today = $6
- do the same thing but this time it is a different number
b. 12 X 3/4 = 9
12 - 9 = 3
— scarf costs 3 days from now = $3
