He among you is the wisest who, like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is really worth nothing at all.
What does it mean? Socrates spoke with a man who was said by many to be wise, but found that this man, like countless others he had spoken to, had no more wisdom than Socrates had, [and that the man even became angry and refused to acknowledge his ignorance when Socrates showed him that this was so,] and therefore Socrates concluded that "it seems I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know".
In other words, despite that all Socrates knows is that he has no wisdom, his wisdom isn't really "worth nothing at all". That is the paradox of Socratic ignorance.
As a result of the attack by Natives on Oñate's men at Acoma,<u> </u><u>a. 10 men, </u><u>including</u><u> Oñate's nephew</u><u>, were </u><u>killed</u><u>.</u>
In 1598, an incident occurred where:
- The Spanish went to meet a Native chief.
- The Spanish engaged violently with the Natives.
- The Natives massacred all 12 Spanish soldiers.
The incident occurred in Acoma and infuriated Oñate such that in the following year, the Spanish attacked Acoma and slaughtered around 800 Natives.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more about the Juan de Oñate at brainly.com/question/7554073.
Pashtun would be your answer hope this helps
With the establishment of trade towns such as Savannah, the Georgia Colony was able to use the natural resources and raw materials available to develop trade in crops, such as, tobacco, cotton, rice, indigo, lumber, furs, fish, pottery, sugar and farm products.
Mainly these were products of slave plantations. The colonists did not like the Mercantilism system as it is a system designed to benefit mainly the country that has established the colones. it was designed to benefit their home country, Great Britain, in that the colonies were to provide the raw materials, then shipping them to Britain to make finished products and them having to buy the finished products.
To enforce mercantilism in the colonies, the British passed a series of laws restricting what the colonist could do, such as requiring the colonist to only transport goods using British ships. In time, the colonist rejected this, and resorted to smuggling from other countries. When the British began to crack down on smuggling, the colonists naturally resisted.
Source: the Foundation for Economic Education
