1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bad White [126]
3 years ago
9

Explain how "muckraking" journalists influenced politicians in the early twentieth century

History
2 answers:
S_A_V [24]3 years ago
6 0

Muckrakers were journalists and other writers that wrote during the Progressive Era, or during the pre-World War I era. They based their writing on exposing the corruption in businesses and governments, providing detailed and accurate accounts of what was going on.

Many Muckrakers would expose big businesses to treating their workers unfairly or even child labor. Since Muckrakers would expose businessmen and politicians, many strived to be better in fear of being exposed and having their businesses and schemes become no longer.

Some politicians even ended up advocating for some of the people being used, like the workers and the children. With this, along with the public outcry of people, the legislation would end up passing laws that protected workers.

kumpel [21]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

The muckrackers played a highly visible role during the early 20 th century, the Progressive Era. In summary, during the Progressive era, which lasted from around 1900 to 1917, muckrcking journalists successfully exposed America's problems brought on by rapid industrialization and growth of cities. Influential muckrackers created public awareness of corruption, social injustices and abuse of power.

You might be interested in
Which statement best describes the effect of the New Deal on the Great Depression?
Lerok [7]

Answer:

The great cost of New Deal programs made the Great Depression worse.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
One reason president George Washington called for a policy of neutrality in the 1790s was to
Dafna1 [17]
One reason President George Washington called for a policy of neutrality in the 1709s was to prevent war with France and Great Britain.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the Columbian Exchange create economic opportunities for Europeans?
IgorC [24]
Exposed them to new lands to conquer as well as spread influence too. It allowed competing countries to appear superior if they conquered land in the land. Land=resources and power all equate to more economic oppurtunities
8 0
4 years ago
Can someone find the answer to this?
asambeis [7]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Washington stayed neutral between Britain and France so there is no way he could have supported the French

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe three key differences between Communism and Fascism
Setler [38]

Answer: there are many forms of communism and fascism (!!!) Italian fascism is not the same as English or Romanian fascism. Differences exist especially in theory, ideology, doctrine. When we move to practice and regime as it works in reality, there are few differences (for example: Communism should be theoretically open to all people without discriminating race....in the USSR Jews were discriminated). So description of differences will be purely theoretical:

1) fascism is born around 1900 whereas Communism came into existence (as a theory) already in 1848 (Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx).

2) Communism has its central authority (Karl Marx)....all the rest is derived from his thought. Fascism lacks that....it is a nebulous plurality of authors, mixture of ideas.

3) Communism is product of Enlightenment (primacy of reason, idea of progress, just society etc.) whereas fascism is a produt of Anti-Enlightenment (irrationalism, primacy of ancestry or race, belief in the soul of nation, sometimes necessity of exceptional leading elite, frequently is linked with some almost religious faith, cult of body, physical strength, very patriarchal, references to Middle Ages).

Explanation: similarities....both were born in times where masses were entering politics and both needs masses. Both preach man of masses. They do not promote individuality, individuality is suppressed.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the Mughals who once lived in India?In the 1700s, the Mughals were Hindu rulers who opposed trade
    8·2 answers
  • The programs initiated by the government in the 1930s were collectively called the _____, and helped to grow the U.S. economy ou
    11·2 answers
  • Explain why events in Mexico were also important to the United States
    7·2 answers
  • Which word identifies a legislature as having only one chamber
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP MEEEEE
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following accurately describes the lieutenant governor?
    15·1 answer
  • Based on the root and affixes, what is the best definition of “incredible?”
    15·2 answers
  • How did the colonists try to address their concerns?
    13·2 answers
  • Nfmafnaljkrfenklac m,acfbhjbhkfjnalwdm ;
    8·2 answers
  • Why did slavery start in the colonies? (HINT: start with indentured servants)
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!