Answer:
Help farmers by increasing total revenue in the market but hurt consumers by raising food prices
Explanation:
Farm subsidies are expensive for taxpayers while also harming the economy and the environment. These government programs restrict farmers from wanting to innovate, cut costs, diversify their use of the land, and perform other necessary actions that bring them economic prosperity. This affects customers by raising food prices.
Not the place to be asking but at this point they are pretty well known.
Answer:
d. the camry becomes an inferior good because the good is now perceived as lower in quality than a lexus
Explanation:
There are a number goods that over time, for a variety of reasons, transition from being a normal good to an inferior good or from being an inferior good to a normal good. One such example of a good is the Toyota Camry. In the 1980s, more income for a household usually resulted in more Camrys being purchased. However, today more Toyota Camrys are purchased by households that have experienced a reduction in income.
How could this happen?
<u>This could only have happened because of a change in perception in households over time. </u>
It is stated in the Scenario that ''today more Toyota Camrys are purchased by households that have experienced a reduction in income.''
<u>That means Toyota Camry has become an inferior good that is purchased more when income falls.</u>
<u>Hence, the only reason the scenario would have occurred is that the camry becomes an inferior good because the good is now perceived as lower in quality</u> than a lexus
Answer:
the price per share in the case when A offers B is $200
Explanation:
The computation of the price per share is as follows:
The fair value is
= ($60 + $120) × 50%
= $90
The 50% represent the percentage of equally
Now the price per share is
= $90 + $90 + $20
= $90 + $110
= $200
Hence, the price per share in the case when A offers B is $200
The same is to be considered
