Answer:
To reduce soft money contributions to political parties.
it has caused spending by interest groups to increase
Explanation:
giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech:
in "citizen united v fec" the supreme court said because corporations giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech and the government cant restrict it. giving money is protected under the first amendment
Soft money is unregulated donations to political parties for general "party-building" purposes, not the support of a particular candidate so it avoid various legal limitations
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aka McCain-Feingold Act is a major amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act 1971 passed by the US congress in 2002. Its goal was to reduce the increased use of soft money to fund advertising by political parties.
brainly.com/question/11364371
investopedia
wikipedia
A secondary source is a textbook
Your Answer: is the emeritus William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford. He is the author of six books, including Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), which won the Pulitzer Prize in History. And, he is a past president of the Society for the History of the Early American Republic.
Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. He’s the author of Originalism and the Good Constitution co-written with John McGinnis.
Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”
Explanation: Your Explanation In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history – Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen. Hope this Helps! :D Happy Early Christmas! :D
There are MANY dangerous countries where people are killed or even enslaved and tortured. So yes America SHOULD provide refuge for immigrants.
Answer:
i believe it is a. thr 10th amendment
