<u>Peter Van Daan’s Motivations/ Actions:</u>
Peter Van Daan is one of the character from the novel ‘The Diary of a Young Girl’ by Anne Frank which depicts the story of the young girl Anne Frank and her family who went into hiding for two years. The story illustrates the horrors of war.
Peter is the son of Van Daan and he is shown as a loner who isn’t quite optimistic and who doesn’t trust of have faith in anything. Anne tries to bring the other side of him, but she realizes that Peter has an inferiority complex.
He mostly acts to benefit himself and he don’t really bother to impress anyone. Peter isn’t really a bold or courageous person, neither in words nor in actions.
Actually, [b]parentheses[/b] add additional information, and they can be ignored. Probably
To compare the points of view of Grandpa and Dad about the past first read the information about them, list the points of view of each person, and finally identify common points and differences through keywords.
<h3>What is to compare?</h3>
A comparison implies identifying both the common points (similarities) and contrasting points (differences) of two or more elements.
<h3>What are the steps to compare Grandpa and Dad's perspectives?</h3>
Even though there is not enough information about who they are or their ideas about the past; here are some basic steps you can follow:
- Carefully read the information about them: The first step is to read and analyze the information of the source about Grandpa and Dad.
- Identify the point of view of each person: After reading the information about them, you need to identify what each person thinks about the past.
- Find similarities and contrasting ideas: Finally, you can compare and contrast the points to view to find out how similar or different they are.
Note: This question is incomplete because there is no information about the perspectives of the people mentioned; due to this, I answered it based on general knowledge.
Learn more about comparison in: brainly.com/question/1516829
Answer:
1. I 2. F 3. F 4. F 5. I 6. I 7. F
Explanation:
<span>semantic fallacy
</span>
A “slam dunk” argument is likely the product of a fallacious syllogism. The word “slam dunk” has actually originated from the basketball games. This word is used to show people a forceful move in the game of basketball. The player puts the ball in the basket with full power and force. It is often considered a dramatic shot in the game. In literary sense, the word can be used to express violent actions as well. It can also be used to describe a vicious fight among individuals. <span> </span>
