Answer:
I believe the answer is (9, -13.5)
Step-by-step explanation:
you do 6×1.5 and -9×1.5 to enlarge/dialate the quadrilateral
again I believe this is right so sorry if I am wrong
Option is B) y-3x=0 represents a proportional relationship between the x and y values
Explanation:
Case 1 = y+4=3x
From the above equation we can see that if we change the value of x, the value of y does not changes by proportionality due to the presence of 4 .
Case 2: y-3x=0
From the above equation we can see that if we change the value of x, the value of y changes by proportionality.
Hence the correct option is B.
Case 3 = y+5x=6
From the above equation we can see that if we change the value of x, the value of y does not changes by proportionality due to the presence of 6.
Case 4 = y+1/4×x=2
From the above equation we can see that if we change the value of x, the value of y does not changes by proportionality due to the presence of 2.
Answer:
(A) there is no relationship between gender and jury verdicts
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is the one in which we assume that there are no relationship between measures.
In this exercise, the only option that assume no relationship between measures(gender and jury verdicts) is
(A) there is no relationship between gender and jury verdicts
-7 = 1 + 2/3n
Subtract 1 from both sides:
-8 = 2/3n
Multiply both sides by 3:
-24 = 2n
Divide both sides by 2:
N= -12
