Answer:
the firm should have sold less output in the local market, and more output on the internet auction site.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that in order to maximize profits the firm should have sold less output in the local market, and more output on the internet auction site. This is because marginal revenue indicates the additional revenue that will be generated by increasing product sales by one unit. Therefore since the internet auction site's marginal revenue is higher than the local store, it means that selling more units in the internet site will lead to more profit than the local market.
Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
She should choose to<span> take a lump-sum of $271,000 now. This is the best option since the other option would have a present value less than $271,000. If you use the present value annuity calculator, you can get the present value of the installment option to be </span>$259,768.60. Therefore, the the lump – sum payment option is the most appropriate.<span> </span>
The rising interest rates make it harder to start concrete businesses (worse loans) so an impact would be online businesses gaining popularity.
