Answer:
The correct answer is a) Research shows that prerelease programs following prison furlough increase dramatically the risks to public safety after release.
Explanation:
Temporary release programs were used to approve the release of a prisoner for a short time to go to his community. The prisoner happened time with his family and then returned to prison, these programs were carried out with the aim that the prisoner would gradually rejoin society.
The use of these programs was decreasing as a consequence of the increasing restrictions for the temporary release of prisoners due to the different situations experienced. Some research showed that temporary release programs put public safety at risk because of prison behavior.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Decreased risk of injury, increased bone density and strength and reduced osteoporosis
<em>Which nations drew new political boundaries in southwest Asia following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I?</em>
<em>The correct answer is A. Great Britain and France. </em>
<em>This took place since October 30, 1918 to November 1, 1922, after Britain, France and Italy occupied Constantinople. With the approval of the League of Nations Mandate, Britain saw as probable to secure the part of the Ottoman Empire after WW1. They considered that it had a strategic position to the Colonial India. Britain struggled against Russia for interests in the same area. Syria and Lebanon became then part of France, though French found resistance, and for this reason, they divided the area into Lebanon and sub-states. </em>
Each law consists of a potential case followed by a prescribed verdict. The verdicts could be very harsh indeed, and Columbia University professor Marc van de Mieroop notes in his book "King Hammurabi of Babylon" (Blackwell Publishing, 2005) that the death penalty is listed as punishment no fewer than 30 times. It was the punishment given even for “the theft of temple or palace property or when a runaway slave
is given refuge,” van de Mieroop writes.
Furthermore, the punishments ordered were by no means uniform but rather depended on the social status of the accused and the accuser. The punishments were only “eye for an eye” if the two individuals involved were socially equal.
Women could not necessarily expect equal treatment either. One law reads, “if a finger has been pointed at a man’s wife because of some male but she has not been caught copulating with another male, she shall leap into the River for the sake of her husband,” (translation by H. Dieter Viel).
GOOD LUCK!!!!!!
MARK AS BRAINLIEST
