In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
The system of Roman numerals is based on using special symbols to denote decimal digits I=1, X=10, C=100, M=1000, and their halves V=5, L=50, D=500. Positive integers are written by repeating these numerals.
Brainliest?
Translate? te podría augurar mejor
Step-by-step explanation:
fjrnrn.dnd.amsamammqmmakakqkkwkwkwjkwk