The early stages of the roman-republic consisted of three branches. <span>The ancient Roman republic had three branches of government. In the beginning, the </span>legislative<span>branch was the Senate, a group made up of 300 citizens from Rome's patrician class, the oldest and wealthiest families of Rome. It was the patricians, tired of obeying the king, who revolted and threw out Tarquinius Superbus. The Senate was the most powerful branch of the Roman republic, and senators held the position for life. The </span>executive<span> branch was made up of two consuls, elected yearly. These two consuls had almost kingly powers, and each could veto, or disapprove of the other's decision. It is quite possible that the idea of two consuls came from Sparta with its two kings. Praetors were part of the </span>judicial<span> branch, they were elected yearly by the people of Rome, and acted as judges. Hope this helps, and if your feeling generous feel free to leave a rate, thanks and a brainliest it would help me reach expert and I would greatly appreciate it ;)</span>
The answer I got was C. Britain
Answer:
They accepted the Christian faith as a major part of their life.
Explanation:
It commenced with a demonstration denominated Christian humanism, or Northerly Renaissance humanism. The significant purpose of this campaign was to transform the Catholic Church. The Christian humanists considered human beings could practice reason (good reasoning and judgment) and develop themselves.
<span>Nixon's southern strategy won the suppowrt of : A. Southern Whites
The southern strategy was imposed by realigning the political position of the republican party to the view of the majority of southern citizen.
The republican party managed to win the election by leveraging the racial tension that exist within that period</span>
Answer:
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question
Explanation:
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question, thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases.
