ANSWER: <span>B) This latest attack is yet another in a long line of lies from the lunatics in the opposing party.
EXPLANATION:
-Inflammatory Language contains statements which cause anger, excitement, or unnecessary wording that might trigger a person or certain group of people.
-All the other choices keep their statements ranging from neutral to somewhat irritating, but Answer B) is savage (calling the opposing party lunatics, dang...)
Hope this Helps!</span>
Answer:
The Ball Poem” is a very subtle and beautiful poem about a little boy’s growing up. The poet sees this little boy one day when he has just lost his ball. The loss of his ball is teaching him that in life, we often lose things and they cannot be easily replaced. Such lessons are a part of growing up, and everyone has to learn them at some point in time or the other. However, it is painful for the poet to watch the boy in his sad state. He is sure that the ball, as well as the person who whistles by the boy, feels the same way as he does.
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Explanation:
I tried my hardest to answer this correctly. Too be 100% honest, I was very confused with this and it took me a little while to understand a few things on here. I'm very sorry if all of this is wrong. :(
I really hope you pass this.
The sentence structure of an "any" word negative sentence is: Subject + auxiliary verb + "not" + main verb + "any" word + object[s].
