All categories

3 years ago

HELPPPP PLEASEE

Mathematics

2 answers:

klio [65]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the graph, we pick a convenient point: (20, 180)

This point means that for 20 hours of work, Vincent is paid 180 dollars. In fraction form, we can write 20hrs/180 dollars. If we simplify the fraction by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 20 we get 1/9 AKA 1hr/9 dollars. So in 1 hour, Vinnie is paid $9.00

Have a good rest of your day

antiseptic1488 [7]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

Step-by-step explanation:

180 for 20 hours of work

rise over run

180/20

9/1

That is diabolical.

It's fantastic. It's got all my special

skills, even my top-ten favorite movies.

What's number one? Star Wars?

Nah, I don't go for that...

...kind of stuff.

No wonder we shouldn't talk to them.

They're out of their minds.

When I leave a job interview, they're

flabbergasted, can't believe what I say.

There's the sun. Maybe that's a way out.

I don't remember the sun

having a big 75 on it.

I predicted global warming.

I could feel it getting hotter.

At first I thought it was just me.

Wait! Stop! Bee!

Stand back. These are winter boots.

Wait!

Don't kill him!

You know I'm allergic to them!

This thing could kill me!

Why does his life have

less value than yours?

Why does his life have any less value

than mine? Is that your statement?

I'm just saying all life has value. You

don't know what he's capable of feeling.

My brochure!

There you go, little guy.

I'm not scared of him.

It's an allergic thing.

Put that on your resume brochure.

My whole face could puff up.

Make it one of your special skills.

Knocking someone out

is also a special skill.

Right. Bye, Vanessa. Thanks.

- Vanessa, next week? Yogurt night?

- Sure, Ken. You know, whatever.

- You could put carob chips on there.

- Bye.

- Supposed to be less calories.

- Bye.

I gotta say something.

She saved my life.

I gotta say something.

All right, here it goes.

Nah.

What would I say?

I could really get in trouble.

It's a bee law.

You're not supposed to talk to a human.

I can't believe I'm doing this.

I've got to.

Oh, I can't do it. Come on!

No. Yes. No.

Do it. I can't.

How should I start it?

"You like jazz?" No, that's no good.

You might be interested in

Find the root(s) of f (x) = (x + 5)3(x - 9)2(x + 1). -5 with multiplicity 3 5 with multiplicity 3 -9

faust18 [17]

Answer:

-5, multiplicity 3; +9, multiplicity 2; -1

Step-by-step explanation:

The roots of f(x) are those values of x that make the factors be zero. For a factor of x-a, the root is x=a, because a-a=0. If the factor appears n times, then the root has multiplicity n.

f(x) = (x+5)^3(x-9)^2(x+1) has roots ...

-5 with multiplicity 3
+9 with multiplicity 2
-1

4 0

3 years ago

Simplify completely. (w15/w5)4 Enter your answer in the box.

Vlad [161]

Answer:w40

Step-by-step explanation:

w15/w5 = w10

(w10)^4 = w40

3 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me I'm doing my packet and the quest is hard

CaHeK987 [17]

The answer would be y=-3/4x-3

5 0

2 years ago

For the equation 3x - 5y = -3, what is the value of y when x is 1? 6/5 -6/5 5/6

babymother [125]

Answer:

$\frac{-6}{5}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$3(1) - 5y = -3\\3 - 5y = -3\\-3 \\5y = -6\\/5 \\\\\frac{-6}{5}$

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You don't need to construct a Venn Diagram, it is just part of the instruction. Just determine whether or not the argument is va

icang [17]

Answer:

It is valid.

Venn Diagram is attached.

I also provided a truth table.

I also provided a couple of names this argument could be called.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this question.

Thank you kindly.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a person is a poet, then that person is a loner.

If a person is a loner, then that person is a taxi driver.

If a person is a poet, then that person is a taxi drive.

This is in the form:

p->q

q->r

Therefore, p->r.

This is an example of a hypothetical syllogism.

The first thing my mind goes to when seeing this is the transitive property which says if A is related to B and B is related to C then A is related to C.

So this syllogism also has another name and it is called the principle of transitivity of implication.

Let p=person is a poet, q=person is a loner, and r=person is a taxi driver.

I'm going to make a truth table and compare the truth values of the propositions to the conclusion.

Since we have 3 variables, we are going to need 2^3=8 rows.

p q r p->q q->r (p->q) and (q->r) conclusion=(p->r)

T T T T T T T

T T F T F F F

T F T F T F T

T F F F T F F

F F F T T T T

F F T T T T T

F T F T F F T

F T T T T T T

So we are trying to see if we ever have the preposition part true and the conclusion false.

That doesn't happen so the argument is valid.

5 0

4 years ago