Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the service level and the corresponding optimal stocking level is shown below:
Given that
Selling price = SP = $4.50
Cost price = CP = $3.00
So,
Salvage value = V = $1.50
Average daily demand (d) = 35 quarts
The standard deviation of daily demand = 4 quarts
based on the above information
Overage cost = (Co) is
= CP - V
= $3.00 - $1.50
= $1.50
Now
Underage cost= (Cu)
= SP - CP
= $4.50 - $3.00
= $1.50
So,
Service level is
= Cu ÷ (Co + Cu)
= 1.50 ÷ (1.50 + 1.50)
= 1.50 ÷ 3.00
= 0.50
= 50%
Now
At 50 % service level, the value of Z is 0
So,
Optimal stocking level is
= d + Z × standard deviation
= 35 + (0 × 4)
= 35 + 0
= 35 quarts
Answer:
$60,000
Explanation:
Sales Price $125,000
Less BV $140, 000
Loss on Sale $15,000
Equipment transferred at BV (Cost $140,000
Less Accumulated Depreciation. $40,000 $100,000 Depreciation.
For 2012
($100,000/5) $40,000 = $60,000
Therefore the Book Value at 12/31/2012 is $60,000
The unemployment charge is the critical indicator which could degree the price of unemployed humans inside the overall labor pressure of the economy.
The unemployment rate would bring about the quantity of people unemployed inside the economy. The unemployment would also have a change off with inflation and is known as philips curve. The unemployment could bring about the fraction of people unemployed inside the economy.
The natural fee of unemployment would be the unemployment level at the whole employment degree in the financial system. The natural fee of unemployment would result in the sum of frictional and the structural unemployment within the economic system.
The increase in the frictional unemployment would result in the increase inside the herbal rate of unemployment as humans might also shift to higher research leaving job or can be unemployed in the transition whilst moving from one process to any other. thus, growth inside the frictional unemployment might bring about the growth in the unemployment within the economic system thereby growing herbal price of unemployment.
Learn more about unemployment here :- brainly.com/question/305041
#SPJ4
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
Answer:
Option D is the correct answer,$ 88,338.48
Explanation:
The liability reported in the balance sheet can be computed by using the pv formula in excel which is stated thus:
=-pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv)
rate is the incremental borrowing rate of 11% per year
nper is the number of payments required to settle the obligation which is 10
pmt is the amount of yearly payment in order to fully settle the debt owed which is $15,000 per year
fv is the future worth of total payments which is not unknown,hence taken as zero
=-pv(11%,10,15000,0)=$ 88,338.48
The correct answer is $ 88,338.48
