Answer:
if foreign investment fell by 100% it would be totally eliminated, so it not possible for it to fall by more than 100%
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that reduction of the western investment for the third world countries consist that foreign investment falls by 350% for the year 1990s
So if we go through the options, the wrong statement is the last one as it shows that the foreign investment fall by 100% i.e to be fully eliminated
Hence the other options are wrong
The following are topics in macroeconomics:
- The optimal interest rate for the Federal Reserve to target
- The effect of a large government's budget deficit on the economy's price level
The following are topics in microeconomics:
How a quota on textile imports affects the textile industry
<h3>What is microeconomics and macroeconomics?
</h3>
Microeconomics studies individuals and business decisions, while macroeconomics studies the government decisions and its impact on the economy.
Macroeconomics is a top-down approach while microeconomics is a bottom-up approach to analysing the economy.
To learn more about macroeconomics, please check: brainly.com/question/13244131
#SPJ1
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
Revenue before continuing business 585000
less:income tax -187000
Continuous business revenue 398,000
Operations stopped
Loss of non-compliance -75000
Less: Applicable drop in income tax from 25500 - 49500
net sales 348500
Popular inventory per share
Continued operating revenue ![[\frac{398000}{100000}] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \$3.98](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B398000%7D%7B100000%7D%5D%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%243.98)
Losses on disrupted businesses, tax net![[\frac{-49500}{100000}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B-49500%7D%7B100000%7D%5D)
Net-0.495
Net profits ![[\frac{348500}{100000}] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3.485](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B348500%7D%7B100000%7D%5D%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%203.485)
Answer:
a) yes
b) no
c) yes
d) no
Explanation:
a) if the A/R balance grow higher than the sales is an indicator that our collection cycle increase thus, customer extend their financiation providing less cash flow
b) this is the opposite as (a) here we extend our financing agaist our suppliers. The payment cycle increases thus, decreasing the overall cash demand
c) If the assets were puirchased on cahs a huge amount was used alrady affecting the liquidity of the company.
If the company finance the purchase of the long term assets, in the future the company will have to dedicate a portion of their future cahs flow to pay up interest and principal which is what we should analize; wether or not the company will have difficulties in the future and the answer is yesin both scenarios.
d) no. It will not, as marketable securities are generally short-term and easily converted into cash in the short term. They do not generate cash flow problems in the long run as the company can sale them anytime to obtain cash.
Answer:
10,000 common stock.
The EPS = earnings per share = Earnings before tax divided by outstanding common stock in issue
