Precedent>E
Unbated>A
Innuendo>C
Blacklist>D
Divisive>B
The effects of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 can be analyzed in three areas of approach.
1) The worst effect of the attacks was the loss of human life. In the attacks, approximately 3,000 people died, who were fulfilling their daily routine in their works, being an immeasurable loss.
2) The economic effect in the US and in the world. The attacks toppled the twin towers of New York, the nation's financial center, directly engaging businesses established there and indirectly across the rest of the country. Stock markets plummeted, jobs were reduced and the impact on GDP was significant. As the world's largest economy, everything that happens in the United States is reflected in the world. Instability has hit all stock exchanges, affecting many businesses and companies around the world.
3) Effect on national sovereignty and the escalation of the fight against terrorism. The September 11 bombing was a turning point in the terrorist escalation, making it the first time the United States was the victim of a major terrorist attack. Capturing and penalizing those responsible was a matter of honor to the country and this only happened in 2011 when Osama Bin Laden was assassinated in Pakistan. Finally, terrorist attacks began to be more frequent in Europe. The US defense system has successfully prevented the protection of the country.
Answer:
<em> Federal Bureau of Investigation </em><em>(FBI)</em>
Explanation:
Funded by a grant from the department of justice of the United States of America, the Internet Crime Complaint Center is a collaboration between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National White-Collar Crime Center.
The Internet Crime Complaint Center was created to provide a more robust and easy feedback mechanism for people convicted of cyber-crime. This Center offers;
- a fair and robust feedback mechanism
- a quick reporting mechanism in cases of violation.
- a central complaint system for the state, federal and local government.
According to Fiedler's contingency model of leadership, a leader's performance depends on their own styles and how much control and influence they have over the circumstance.
<h3>What is Fiedler's theory of contingent leadership?</h3>
According to Fiedler's Contingency Theory, a leader's leadership style needs to be appropriate for the circumstances in order to be effective. You can use this model to determine your own leadership style, evaluate the situation that calls for leadership, and assess whether you are the best candidate.
Consider a basketball team as a first example of using Fiedler's model, as they have a disciplined work, a low amount of power, and (in theory) good leader-member connections. Instead of a relationship-focused coach giving everyone an equal voice in this situation, you would want a task-oriented coach to define the game strategy.
<h3>What is suggested by Fielder's theory?</h3>
Most notably, Fiedler's theory contends that a leader's personality is not the sole factor in determining how effective they are. Instead, this situational theory contends that when people are in settings that support their particular leadership philosophies, they develop into supportive leaders.
Learn more about Fiedler's Contingency Theory: brainly.com/question/20709656
#SPJ1
