Answer:
It is considered as an <em>unanticipated problem.
</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
An unanticipated problem occurs when an investigation arises in a situation that was not considered in advance by the investigator.
In this investigation, which is a study with drugs, the risks rise, and an unforeseen event arises. Therefore the investigator must modify the informed consent, and the subjects must reaffirm the same to continue in the study.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
<span>Hypotheses generally (although not always) follow an "If-then" format. This eliminates the first and fourth choices. Of the other two, the second choice (regarding cold weather and tires) can still be tested and verified. The third statement, regarding the end of WWII, is a statement that can't be verified to any appreciable extent and can only go on eyewitness testimony and historical testimony, so it fails the scientific method test.</span>
I filled out the survey! Branliest?
Answer: Should not view any television program
Explanation:
The American Academy of Pediatrics says that children under the age of two should not watch television program how their brain is building that period which could be an effect when they do. This was discovered by Christakis study where he showed that children in this age bracket don't develope a normal brain and care is necessary for the development of their brain.
Answer:
Hearsay.
Explanation:
'The truth of the matter asserted' means that the statement stated by the witness itself serves as an evidence as a proof of the statement.
Hearsay, under the Federal rules, is a statement stated by the witness at the trial to prove the substance of the matter, or the truth of the matter asserted. When a witness recites an out-of-the-court statement, it means he/she is giving a hearsay statement.
The Federal rules prohibits any hearsay statements during any hearing or proceedings.
Therefore, the correct answer is hearsay.
