Answer:
He has given us multiple perspectives on issues we face every day, while making it enjoyable to learn about. His imaginative storylines, eye-catching characters, and bright burst of colors in his books add a fun factor to learning. Dr. Seuss influence on us is greater than some of us realize.
Explanation:
I love his books! I have read them all! have a good day mate
- <u>The definition of a market economy is one in which price and production is controlled by buyers and sellers freely conducting business</u>
<h3>
<u>example</u></h3>
- <u>the United States economy where the investment and production decisions are based on supply and demand.</u>
<u>
</u>
<u>#</u><u>c</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>r</u><u>y</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>l</u><u>e</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>n</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u>g</u>
Answer:
For a war if I'm right. I think that was the beginning of the American Civil War. I could be wrong though.
Explanation:
The Mongolian empire influenced the development of Russian culture and economics. The mongols expected the Russians to pay tribute for holding their own kingdom. it destroyed Russia's economy was affected them to trade with others and puts them in isolation with the rest of the world. So the Russians turned to the east, in language, the arts,and religion. During the golden Horde Islamic and Muslim culture and religion was an influence.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. As a result of 20th century Supreme Court rulings, symbolic political speech gained substantial protections from government regulations.
Explanation:
Symbolic speech is a term that describes communicative situations in which the message transmitted is not literally expressed by the interlocutor. This type of speech is covered by the First Amendment implicitly.
Rulings such as Tinker v. Des Moines, United States v. O'Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and Cohen v. California expanded the protection of this type of discourse, including it within the protections of the First Amendment to freedom of expression.
For example, in the case Texas v. Johnson, it was established that the burning of an American flag involved a case of symbolic speech, so it should not be subject to prohibition by any type of law.
