Answer:
a. For each country, graph the production possibilities frontier. Suppose that without trade the workers in each country spend half their time producing each good. Identify this point in your graphs.
b. Who has the comparative advantage in the production of shirts? What about for computers?
- China has the comparative advantage in the production of shirts, while the US has the comparative advantage in the production of computers.
c. If these countries were open to trade, which country would export shirts? Give a specific numerical example and show it on your graphs. Which country would benefit from trade?
- China would export 50 million shirts in exchange for 5 million computers (or more if they can). Trade would benefit the US since it will only need to trade 5 million computers in exchange for 50 million shirts, and it will still have 15 million computers that it can consume or trade with come other country.
d. Explain at what price of computers (in terms of shirts) the two countries might trade.
- the minimum and maximum prices would be 5 to 10 shirts per computer. If the price of shirts per computer is 10 or near 10, then the US wins more. If the price of shirts per computer is 5 or near 5, then China wins more.
Explanation:
opportunity cost of producing 1 shirt in the US = 20/100 = 0.2 computers
opportunity cost of producing 1 computer in the US = 100/20 = 5 shirts
opportunity cost of producing 1 shirt in China = 10/100 = 0.1 computers
opportunity cost of producing 1 computer in China = 100/10 = 10 shirts
without trade:
- total production of shirts in the US = 50 million
- total production of computer in the US = 10 million
- total production of shirts in China = 50 million
- total production of computer in China = 5 million
with trade:
- total production of computers in the US = 20 million
- total production of shirts in China = 100 million
Answer:
Edgar
The amount he will owe on this debt in 2 years for quarterly compounding is:
= $7,387.28
Explanation:
Accumulated loan debt = $5,000
Interest rate per year = 20%
Period of loan = 2 years
Interest compounding = quarterly
From an online financial calculator:
N (# of periods) 8
I/Y (Interest per year) 20
PV (Present Value) 5000
PMT (Periodic Payment) 0
Results
FV = $7,387.28
Total Interest $2,387.28
Answer:
3.73%
Explanation:
The computation of the rate of interest that makes the equivalent is shown below:
As we know that
Present value=Cash flow × Present value discounting factor ( interest rate% , time period)
Let us assume the interest rate be x
where,
Present value of $400,000 is
= $400,000 ÷ 1.0x ^5
And,
Present value of $1,000,000 be
= $1,000,000 ÷ 1.0x^30
Now eqaute these two equations
$400,000 ÷ 1.0x^5 = $1,000,000 ÷ 1.0x^30
(1.0x^30) ÷ (1.0x^5) = $1,000,000 ÷ $400,000
1.0x^(30 - 5)=2.5
1.0x^25=2.5
1.0x = (2.5)^(1 ÷ 25)
x =1.03733158 - 1
= 3.73%
Neoclassical economics places a larger focus on providing extra options and <u>improving living standards, </u><u>which are ultimately decided by long-term progress.</u>
As a result, it focuses on long-term growth rather than fighting recessions.
In actuality, neoclassical economics holds that a product's price is mostly influenced by its manufacturing costs. According to neoclassical economics, the primary factor for client decision-making therefore becomes price.
As a result, letting the neoclassical economists concentrate on prices is not the best way to combat the recession. Long-term economic performance is always emphasized by neoclassical economists.
Note that the neoclassical approach to macroeconomics emphasizes the idea that, over time, the economy tends to recover to its potential GDP and natural unemployment rate.
Learn what John Maynard Keynes would recommend to fight the recession: brainly.com/question/25586856
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. investment expenditures
Explanation:
The reason for this is that during business cycles investors gain trust in the economy during a boom and invest a lot and during a recession they lose trust in the economy and decrease their investment by a lot, where as a lot of consumption like food, medicine, petrol etc remains mostly unaffected by changes in business cycle. Also government spending does not fluctuate a lot during the course of a business cycle because government spending is either long term like development projects.
