Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
Answer: forces banks with greater risk to maintain more capital.
Explanation:
The Basel Accord are a set of regulations in the banking industry that enables the proper functioning of banks, if these regulations for banks are strictly adhered to, banks would rarely have problems of total failure which leads to the bank closing up.
The Basel Accord is named after the city of Basel in Switzerland where the meetings took place, the Accord majored on the minimum financial requirements of banks.
A a lease is like renting something ( example: joe leased his corvette from the Chevrolet dealership he lease his corvette for three year then brung it back and bought a 2018 corvette
I hope that helped
Answer:
The company should recognize a gain on disposal of $29500
Explanation:
The straight line depreciation method charges a constant depreciation expense per year through out the estimated useful life of the asset.
The straight line depreciation expense per year is,
(Cost - salvage value) / estimated useful life
Depreciation expense = (910000 - 0) / 8 = $113750
The number of years till 31 December 2013 = 6 years
The accumulated depreciation till December 31, 2013 = 113750 * 6 = $682500
The carrying value of the asset at 31 December 2013 = 910000 - 682500 = $227500
The gain/loss on sale = 257000 - 227500 = $29500 gain
