1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
14

Brazil is one of the world’s lowest-cost producers of ethanol and soybeans. Japanese corporations have heavily invested in Bra

zil to lease large tracts of land to grow soybeans for export to Japan, where the soybeans are used to derive products such as soy sauce and chicken feed. Why do these Japanese companies invest in Brazil?
Business
1 answer:
guapka [62]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The Japanese companies invest in Brazil in order to cut cost.

Explanation:

Since Brazil is one of the world's lowest-cost producers of ethanol and soybeans. Japanese corporations investing heavily in Brazil to lease large tracts of land to grow soybeans for export to Japan, are doing this in order to minimize their cost.

Growing soyabeans in Brazil is cheaper since there's a lower cost of producing it when compared to the higher cost of producing it in Japan. This in turn, helps the Japanese companies reduce their cost as the cost of factor Input is reduced and also the Japanese companies can make more profit.

You might be interested in
Entrepreneurial strategies an entrepreneur should adopt when undertaking entrepreneurial business venture
notsponge [240]
I don’t understand your question
4 0
3 years ago
Olympia Autos Inc. merged with its competitor Vaca Autos Inc. This allowed Olympia Autos to use its technological competencies a
zlopas [31]

Answer:

Olympia Autos Inc. and Vaca Autos Inc.

This merger scenario illustrates the power of synergy.

Explanation:

Synergy is achieved with Olympia Autos Inc that has technological competencies, merging with Vaca Autos' marketing capacities.  This enable the two entities to achieve more as one than they could have achieved individually.   By capturing a larger market share, the two entities have shown that the combination of resources in pursuit of some common objectives is more beneficial than separate efforts.

4 0
3 years ago
Fischer Company uses 12,000 units of a part in its production process. The costs to make a part are: direct material, $15; direc
Trava [24]

Answer:

Difference= $60,000 in favor of buying

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Number of units= 12,000

Make in-house:

Direct material, $15

direct labor, $27

variable overhead, $15

applied fixed overhead, $32

Buy:

Buying price= $60

If Fischer buys the part, 75 percent of the applied fixed overhead would continue.

<u>First, we will calculate the avoidable fixed overhead per unit:</u>

Avoidable fixed overhead= 32*0.25= $8

<u>Now, the total differential cost of making in-house:</u>

<u></u>

Total cost of production= 12,000*(15 + 27 + 15 + 8)

Total cost of production= 12,000*65

Total cost of production= $780,000

Total cost of buying= 60*12,000= $720,000

Difference= $60,000 in favor of buying

4 0
2 years ago
"Christie and Jergens formed a partnership with capital contributions of $300,000 and $400,000, respectively. Their partnership
Katen [24]

Answer:

The Christie and Jergens's respective shares are $92,500 and $42,500.

Explanation:

For computing the Christie and Jergens's respective shares, first, we have to compute the remaining income which is to be shared between these two partners. The computation is shown below:

= Net income - salary - interest on total capital

= $135,000 - $60,000 - 10% × ($300,000 + $400,000)

= $135,000 - $60,000 - $70,000

= $5,000

So, the remaining income would be divided equally between the partners

Now

Christie shares = Salary + interest on capital + remaining income

                         = $60,000 + ($300,000 × $10%) + $2,500

                         = $60,000 + $30,000 + $2,500

                         = $92,500

And, the Jergens shares  =  interest on capital + remaining income

                                          = ($400,000 × $10%) + $2,500

                                          = $40,000 + $2,500

                                          = $42,500

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose that over the past year, the real interest rate was 3 percent, the cpi was 126.2 at the beginning of the year, and the c
Orlov [11]
A is the answer of these questions you had ask....
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Global Company sold merchandise to Montana Industries for cash, $3,450. The cost of merchandise sold was $1,850. Global Company
    10·1 answer
  • The following transactions are July activities of Bill’s Extreme Bowling, Inc., which operates several bowling centers.
    7·1 answer
  • Arcs and Triangles paid an annual dividend of $1.47 a share last month. The company is planning on paying $1.55, $1.63, and $1.6
    11·1 answer
  • How do we obtain a high credit score?
    6·2 answers
  • Jessica is attempting to regulate her emotions on the job. She has been trying to suppress her anger about being overlooked for
    6·1 answer
  • For which pairs of goods is the cross-price elasticity most likely to be positive? a. peanut butter and jelly b. bicycle frames
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following best defines self discipline:
    7·1 answer
  • Crane Company had these transactions during the current period. June 12 Issued 87,000 shares of $1 par value common stock for ca
    13·1 answer
  • The journal entry to transfer completed products from production to finished goods inventory includes which two of the following
    15·1 answer
  • Which dimensions should a marketer consider when dealing with the human aspect of distribution channels?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!