35.001 is the closest of the 5 to 35.
Answer: The required solution is
Step-by-step explanation: We are given to solve the following differential equation :
Let us consider that
be an auxiliary solution of equation (i).
Then, we have
Substituting these values in equation (i), we get
![5m^2e^{mt}+3me^{mt}-2e^{mt}=0\\\\\Rightarrow (5m^2+3y-2)e^{mt}=0\\\\\Rightarrow 5m^2+3m-2=0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[\textup{since }e^{mt}\neq0]\\\\\Rightarrow 5m^2+5m-2m-2=0\\\\\Rightarrow 5m(m+1)-2(m+1)=0\\\\\Rightarrow (m+1)(5m-1)=0\\\\\Rightarrow m+1=0,~~~~~5m-1=0\\\\\Rightarrow m=-1,~\dfrac{1}{5}.](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=5m%5E2e%5E%7Bmt%7D%2B3me%5E%7Bmt%7D-2e%5E%7Bmt%7D%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20%285m%5E2%2B3y-2%29e%5E%7Bmt%7D%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%205m%5E2%2B3m-2%3D0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~%5B%5Ctextup%7Bsince%20%7De%5E%7Bmt%7D%5Cneq0%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%205m%5E2%2B5m-2m-2%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%205m%28m%2B1%29-2%28m%2B1%29%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20%28m%2B1%29%285m-1%29%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20m%2B1%3D0%2C~~~~~5m-1%3D0%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20m%3D-1%2C~%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D.)
So, the general solution of the given equation is
Differentiating with respect to t, we get
According to the given conditions, we have
and
![y^\prime(0)=2.8\\\\\Rightarrow -A+\dfrac{B}{5}=2.8\\\\\Rightarrow -5A+B=14\\\\\Rightarrow -5A-A=14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[\textup{Uisng equation (ii)}]\\\\\Rightarrow -6A=14\\\\\Rightarrow A=-\dfrac{14}{6}\\\\\Rightarrow A=-\dfrac{7}{3}.](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%5E%5Cprime%280%29%3D2.8%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20-A%2B%5Cdfrac%7BB%7D%7B5%7D%3D2.8%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20-5A%2BB%3D14%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20-5A-A%3D14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~%5B%5Ctextup%7BUisng%20equation%20%28ii%29%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20-6A%3D14%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20A%3D-%5Cdfrac%7B14%7D%7B6%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20A%3D-%5Cdfrac%7B7%7D%7B3%7D.)
From equation (ii), we get
Thus, the required solution is
Definition of eo-primes or relatively primes: Two numbers are said to be co-prime or relatively prime If their HCF IS 1 Hence to prove 847 and 2160 as co-prime numbers we will find their HCF and which should be 1
New steps to find HCF will be as under
2160 = 847 x 2+ 466
847 = 466 ×1 +381
466 = 381 x 1 + 85
381 =85 x 4+ 41
85 =41 x 2+3
41 =3 x 13+ 2
3 =2 x 1+1
2 =1 x 2+0
Therefore, the HCF=1 Hence, the numbers are co-primes (relatively prime).
Answer:
. 0625
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2^4
or
1/16
just doing half life
Answer:
Some answers to the reducing fraction sheet
Q14 = 4/5 because divide 12 and 15 by 3
Q15=can't be reduced because 11 is a prime number so it can't be divided by anything
Q17=can't be reduced because 17 is a prime number
Q18=can't be reduced because 13 is a prime number
Q19=38/9 because 114 and 27 would be divided by 3
Q20= -1/1 because you would divide both 14,529 by itself would equal to - 1/1
I can only help you with this sheet I can't help you with the other one hope this was helpful! :)
