Answer:
Frémont decried the expansion of slavery, while Buchanan warned that the Republicans were extremists whose victory would lead to civil war. ... Buchanan won a plurality of the popular vote and a majority of the electoral vote, taking all but one slave state and five free states.
Instance of recurring event: United States presidential Election
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 1856
Leonardo Da Vinci
Michaelangelo
These are the most common
You haven’t told us the statements..
Answer:
Explanation: Although there were many geographic features near the Plateau Tribes, perhaps the most important one was the Columbia River, which provided large amounts of salmon and eel for the tribes.The area also is surrounded by the Cascade Mountains, and Sierra Nevada Mountains on the west, and part of the Rocky Mountains on the east side, and the Columbia Plateau. Over forty seven tribes lived in this area.
Explanation:
After winning the 1936 presidential election in a landslide, Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a bill to expand the membership of the Supreme Court. The law would have added one justice to the Court for each justice over the age of 70, with a maximum of six additional justices. Roosevelt’s motive was clear – to shape the ideological balance of the Court so that it would cease striking down his New Deal legislation. As a result, the plan was widely and vehemently criticized. The law was never enacted by Congress, and Roosevelt lost a great deal of political support for having proposed it. Shortly after the president made the plan public, however, the Court upheld several government regulations of the type it had formerly found unconstitutional. In National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, for example, the Court upheld the right of the federal government to regulate labor-management relations pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Many have attributed this and similar decisions to a politically motivated change of heart on the part of Justice Owen Roberts, often referred to as “the switch in time that saved nine.” Some legal scholars have rejected this narrative, however, asserting that Roberts' 1937 decisions were not motivated by Roosevelt's proposal and can instead be reconciled with his prior jurisprudence.
