Using Visual inspection, the model which fits the data in the distribution better is the power function.
The power and linear functions can of the data can both be modeled using technology,
<u>Using Technology</u> :
The power function in the form 
which models the data is 
The linear function in the form 
which models the data is 
- Where A = intercept and B = slope
- From the model, correlation coefficient given by the power and linear models are 0.999 and 0.986 respectively.
- Hence, the power model is a better fit for the data than the linear model.
Therefore, Inspecting the models visually, the power function fits the data better as the points on the curve are closer to the regression line than on the linear model.
Learn more :brainly.com/question/18405415
Interpreting the situation, it is found that Marjorie will have 240 left after paying her penalty.
---------------------
- When the piece lands on the red square, the penalty is equal to <u>30 times the sum they roll on two numbers.</u>
- Marjorie rolls 4 and 2, thus, the sum is 6.
- The penalty is of
- She currently has 420, the penalty removes 180, thus, she will have 420 - 180 = 240 left after paying her penalty.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/12166019
Answer:
$1,061
Step-by-step explanation:
2% of 1000 is 20.
If 2% is compounded yearly, then
year one- $1,020
year two- $1,040.40
year three- $1,061.21
Rounded to the nearest whole dollar, Elaine would have $1,061 in her savings account after three years.
You have the right idea but the endpoint is at the wrong location. Instead, the green dot should go at -1. The shading is to the right. We use a closed filled in circle here (instead of an open hole) to tell the reader "include the endpoint". So -1 is part of the solution set.
In short, the graph consists of a closed filled in circle at -1 with shading to the right. This visually describes all values that are larger than -1, or equal to -1.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Many students gets confused with these exponential problems, they often get misguided but understand that there is nothing to be confused of.
When you have a negative number, you just take the reciprocal of the whole exponent number.
What is a reciprocal?
Let's take an integer for example, let's take the number 3.
The reciprocal for 3 is (1/3)
Let's take an other number, let's take 2/3
The reciprocal for 2/3 is (3/2)
In conclusion, we just reverse the denominator and the numerator or just switch it.
We take 3 as (3/1) and that is the reason, the reciprocal would be (1/3)
Now, coming to the negative integers. Taking an example:
(2)⁻¹
This would be become (1/2¹) = (1/2)
Hence, the result of a negative integer is positive but would be a fraction.
Hope I helped!
