The US has typically benefited greatly from immigration. The most notable citizens of the US often came to the country as immigrants or first-generation citizens. In order to create a very open and happy culture that encouraged independence and ambition, we combined elements of the British core culture with the Nordic work ethic and values, the Irish mischief and love of the underdog, the Italian and Spanish influences, as well as those of the African, Chinese, and Mexican immigrants.
However, there have been instances when having too many immigrants has seriously affected the US. It has sparked several recessions and deflations. For instance, a rush of immigrants starting in the 1870s outpaced our ability to assimilate them, contributing significantly to the slump of 1890. Even worse, people were congregating in ethnic ghettos, which was seriously harming the country and destroying the pay scale, leading to an almost complete economic collapse. Similar trends are being observed with the influx of refugees and illegal immigrants into the US. Our economy is being destroyed by a lack of integration, ethnic ghettos, and labor excess, and national unity is hanging by a thread as a result.
Westward Expansion undoubtedly had something to do with immigration. At that time, the nation was experiencing a massive influx of immigration, which essentially compelled an expansion in order to provide immigrants and settlers with sufficient housing. I think the Westward Expansion would have taken place whether there had been an inflow of immigrants or not. Immigration made a significant contribution to the economy's and society's variety. The trading environment will undergo a significant transformation during this time due to the new skill sets that were coming from varied ethnicities. Without immigration, Westward Expansion certainly would have been conceivable. Earlier than immigration began to rise, colonists and settlers were already relocating west.
Thank you,
Eddie
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B.
<span>Such nonviolent resistance, he said, “calls for the strength and courage to suffer without fear.”</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
<span>Which of the following government types reflects Charles de Montesquieu's philosophy of government?
</span>Government
California and its Constitution are prohibited from violating fundamental rights provided by the United States Constitution. While the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
<h3>What is constitution?</h3>
Constitution refers to the document which contains all the set of the laws and the principles in order to govern the nation. All the government bodies, agencies, institute and the company are abide by the laws of the constitution.
Fundamental rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution may not be violated by California or its constitution. The California Constitution outlines the responsibilities, prerogatives, organizational structure, and activities of the state government, but the United States Constitution remains the highest law of the land.
The constitution of the California and United States contains the general similarity. They both two chambers of the houses that mean they have bicameral legislature.
Learn more about Constitution here:
brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ1
Yes, yes i can. what do you need help with?
