Answer: 1309.24 I used calculations and I think this is right
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
see below for the graph
Step-by-step explanation:
The desired graph has two y-intercepts and one x-intercept. It is not the graph of a function.
Here's one way to get there.
__
Start with the parent function y = |x| and scale it down so that it has a y-intercept of -1 and x-intercepts at ±1.
Now, it is ...
f(x) = |x| -1
We want to scale this vertically by a factor of -5. this puts the y-intercept at +5 and leaves the x-intercepts at ±1.
Horizontally, we want to scale the function by an expansion factor of 3. The transformed function g(x) will be ...
g(x) = -5f(x/3) = -5(|x/3| -1) = -5/3|x| +5
This function has two x-intercepts at ±3 and one y-intercept at y=5. By swapping the x- and y-variables, we can get an equation for the graph you want:
x = -(5/3)|y| +5
______
<em>Comment on this answer</em>
Since there are no requirements on the graph other than it have the listed intercepts, you can draw it free-hand through the intercept points. It need not be describable by an equation.
Answer:
-6/7
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope is negative, around -1
Answer:
Pemdas subtracting would be last
Step-by-step explanation:
Selection C is appropriate.
Probably, the function only usefully describes the height between the time it is thrown (x=0) and the time it lands (x=5).
_____
Conceivably, a function can be written that would describe height before it is thrown and after it hits the ground (as after it bounces, for example). In that case, one might be interested for the domain of "all real numbers" or at least "all real numbers representing the time during which the object was in existence."