Answer:
The correct answer is a. Identify direct expenses; allocate indirect expenses; allocate service department expenses.
Explanation:
Selling costs are the costs incurred by a company to market the products or services, such as the salary of the sellers, commissions, gasoline of the trucks that distribute the orders, advertising, etc. Administrative expenses are the costs incurred by a company to manage its operations. Examples of these expenses would be the salary of the accountant, the surveillance expenses, the expenses for the cleaning service, stationery, salaries and benefits of the administrative staff of the company, etc. Some concepts can be shared, such as office rent. If there are sales and administration departments in the same building; The total expenditure must be applied to the two departments according to the space each of them uses (square meters) or at an estimated percentage; for the therefore, of the total rent one part would be selling expenses and another part administration expenses.
Answer:
a. Cost of goods sold = Sales - Gross profit
= $416,720 - $242,950
= $173,770
b. Direct materials cost = Materials purchased -Indirect materials - Materials inventory, end of period
= $128,350 - $45,220 - $17,090
= $66,060
c. Direct labor cost =Total manufacturing costs for the period - Direct materials cost - Factory overhead
= $239,610 - $66,060 - ($90,430 + $45,220 + $13,750)
= $239,610 - $66,060 - $149,380
=$239,610 - $215,440
=$24,170
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Answer:
B. Texas real estate commission
Explanation:
The Texas real estate commission is a government agency based in Texas. They are responsible for overseeing the licensing of real estate brokers and agents. They are responsible for governing the practices of real estate in Texas. They regulate organizations and individuals that in brokerage businesses. They interprete and enforce the licensing laws of real estate in Texas. They safeguard consumers/costumers in matters of real estate transactions.
