The behaviour of the brother, pretending to listen but not actually listening and focused elsewhere but asking him to repeat what the speaker said is likely due to echoic behaviour. Although he is able to repeat the last few words.
When verbal conduct is in point-to-point correspondence with the verbal stimulus before it, it is said to be echoic. It's a verbal imitation of what comes right before it, or an "echo," to use laypeople's parlance. There are various behaviour analytic procedures that employ echoics to teach other verbal behaviours like manding, intraverbals, and tacting! The capacity to echo words is a key skill in early language learning.
A verbal action that shares point-to-point correspondence with the vocal-verbal stimulus that inspires it is known as an echoic reaction.
To learn about echoic behaviour tap here:
brainly.com/question/28200107
#SPJ4
The correct answer is; Religion
Further Explanation:
The Hindu religion had a lot of influence over the Gupta culture in India. There were Hindu gods that had huge statues places all over the land. Most of the artwork was based on the Hindu practices and traditions. They held rituals that the Hindus also used.
The Gupta era has always been remembered as a time that was defined by their creative side. They had wonderful art, scholars, and great literature. Many books and papers found from that era were all based on religion and were written in poetry and drama.
Learn more about the Gupta empire at brainly.com/question/5718733
#LearnwithBrainly
D none the scheme is not 10-15 households
Answer:
Experience emotional or psychological distress
Explanation:
In this research, participants as adults are going to be taken back memory lane to when they were kids and were abused as children. Even as adults, many do not like to talk about their experience of abuse as kids. Thus, this research is likely to steer up some emotional response as they think back to experiences that were not befitting a human, not to talk of them as kids. Hence, it is almost a given that most, if not all of the participants would experience emotional or psychological distress.
Answer:
Affirmative Action isn't ethical. There is no real theory that justifies it.
Explanation:
I doubt that this reasoning is based on any rational theory. In the first place, you can't repay the sins of a past generation by placing burdens on a generation living presently. That simply requiring one group of people to suffer for what another group did. And, anyway, the theory doesn't work for white people. When whites suffer enslavement, as they have in the past, at the hands of Mongols, or at the hands of Arabs, then nobody raises the subject of Affirmative Action. In other words, whatever "theory" is being used, isn't being used consistently. And that means that the ostensible justification for Affirmative Action isn't the real reason that it is used.
