B is the answer! Lmk if there’s any more questions
Explanation:
Colonization, or colonisation refers to large-scale population movements where the migrants maintain strong links with their or their ancestors' former country, gaining significant privileges over other inhabitants of the territory by such links. When colonization takes place under the protection of colonial structures, it may be termed settler colonialism. This often involves the settlers dispossessing indigenous inhabitants, or instituting legal and other structures which systematically disadvantage them.
In its basic sense, colonization can be defined as the process of establishing foreign control over target territories or people for the purpose of cultivation, often through establishing colonies and possibly by settling them.
In colonies established by Western European countries in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand, settlers (supplemented by Central European, Eastern European, Asian and African people) eventually formed a large majority of the population after killing, assimilating or driving away indigenous peoples.
What Justice Brown says about a law that implies "merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races is that the distinction will continues though , there is no eradicate legal equality.
<h3>How did
Justice Brown legal distinction between the white and
colored races?</h3>
Justice Brown perceive this as something that will not stop so far there is distinguishing of the white from the other race .
However , he came to conclusion that this does not have tendency to bring destruction to legal equality of the races.
learn more about Justice Brown at brainly.com/question/24812344
#SPJ1
This is an opinion question, but I believe that it is possible to seize political control over a country without oppressing the country's people. However, history has shown otherwise (Nazi Germany, British Empire) but we can use past mistakes to improve our future world.
