Answer:
(B) multicollinearity is present.
Explanation:
Multicollinearity -
It is the process where , one of the predictor variable in the multiple regression model can be linearly predicted from the others with the substantial degree of accuracy , is known as multicollinearity or collinearity .
<u>In this case , the coefficient estimated of the multiple regression can change erratically for even a small change in the model .</u>
hence , from the question , the indication is of (B) multicollinearity is present .
Answer:
C) marketing channel or channel of distribution
Explanation:
The distribution channel (or marketing channel or downstream supply chain) refers to the chain of businesses that act as intermediaries through which a product or service passes. The distribution channel starts at the producer of the product or service and ends in the final customer.
Answer:
The businesses paid $24 billion in entrepreneurial ability. This value comes from subtracting the wages, rent and interest from the total amount of businesses' purchase. In this case 170 - 88 - 24 - 34 = 24.
Explanation:
This value can be understood as goodwill that households are recognized for their ideas and can bring a future return to the businesses. The businesses had assessed the future stream of cash the household could bring and, basing our guess on businesses behaving rationally, and they found that 170 was an amount that will recognize these future opportunities
Answer:
C: Self-directed work groups and virtual teams.
Explanation:
SDWT (Self-directed work groups and virtual teams) are the groups in offices who possess different skills, and even aren't working on the same project which that they don't have same purpose as you have but still they are in your team.
<em>Since</em>, there is not any dedicated team for my project, I am just moving into other teams for every new project I am going int o self-directed work groups and virtual teams.
The missing word in the blank is :
small
hence the completed paragraph is:
The coach is weighing a slightly increased risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. this weighing of trade-offs is an example of marginal thinking, because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u><em>small</em></u> shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
