Because a civil war is war happening within the same country, hence the literal name.
The negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices include:
- The risk of bias
- The possibility of selecting an unqualified an inexperienced person
<h3>What are political leanings?</h3>
In the U.S., some people belong to the conservative political group while others belong to the liberal or democratic group.
It is wrong to select a Supreme Court Justice on any of these basis because the emotion is a major player that can lead to the wrong choices.
In such cases, the qualifications of the candidates might be overlooked due to bias.
Learn more about political leanings here:
brainly.com/question/1470181
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.
Explanation:
Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called <em>"Wal-lam-wat-kain," </em>a Native American tribe.
Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the <em>Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.</em>
The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that <u>the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty,</u> while <u>Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.</u>
For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.
