Answer:
Tn = 2Tn-1 - Tn-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Before we can generate the recursive sequence, we need to find the nth term of the given sequence.
nth term of an AP is given as:
Tn = a+(n-1)d
If a17 = -40
T17 = a+(17-1)d = -40
a+16d = -40 ...(1)
If a28 = -73
T28 = a+(28-1)d = -73
a+27d = -73 ...(2)
Solving both equations simultaneously using elimination method.
Subtracting 1 from 2 we have:
27d - 16d = -73-(-40)
11d = -73+40
11d = -33
d = -3
Substituting d = -3 into 1
a+16(-3) = -40
a - 48 = -40
a = -40+48
a = 8
Given a = 8, d = -3, the nth term of the sequence will be
Tn = 8+(n-1) (-3)
Tn = 8+(-3n+3)
Tn = 8-3n+3
Tn = 11-3n
Given Tn = 11-3n and d = -3
Tn-1 = Tn - d... (3)
Tn-1 = 11-3n +3
Tn-1 = 14-3n
Tn-2 = Tn-2d...(4)
Tn-2 = 11-3n-2(-3)
Tn-2 = 11-3n+6
Tn-2 = 17-3n
From 3, d = Tn - Tn-1
From 4, d = (Tn - Tn-2)/2
Equating both common difference
(Tn - Tn-2)/2 = Tn - Tn-1
Tn - Tn-2 = 2(Tn - Tn-1)
Tn - Tn-2 = 2Tn-2Tn-1
2Tn-Tn = 2Tn-1 - Tn-2
Tn = 2Tn-1 - Tn-2
The recursive formula will be
Tn = 2Tn-1 - Tn-2
Answer: x=2
Step-by-step explanation:
if u plug in the value of x=2 into the equation both sides equal -22/5
Answer:
The Answer is 76.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the normal distribution " 10% of employees (rated) exemplary, 20% distinguished, 40% competent, 20% marginal, and 10% unacceptable'', we can see that exemplary employees are top 10% rated employees.
We have the formula for normal distribution:
z=(X-M)÷σ
where z is the <em>minimum z-score </em>for top 10% employee, X is the <em>minimum </em>score for top 10% employee, M is the <em>mean</em> of the score distribution, σ is the <em>standard deviation</em> of the score distribution.
The z-score we are looking for is the value "a" that separates the highest 10% from the lowest 90% i.e. P(z≤a)=0.90
If we look at z-table, corresponding value for a is 1.28155
We can now put the values in the formula:
1.28155=
So X=(1.28155×20)+50=75.631
Therefore minimum score for exemplary employee is 76.
Answer:
58
Step-by-step explanation:
all triangles add up to 180 degress
180-64=116
because its an isosceles triangle divide by two
116/2=58
Answer:
B: Yes, his claim is reasonable because 90% is in the interval estimate.
Step-by-step explanation:
