Answer:
The answer with the mayor.
Explanation:
With the 2d sentence, It sounds like HEATHER is quacking loudly,
And in the 3rd, It sounds like the toy is complaining.
B. Comparison and/or contrast
Answer:
The soldier is pointing out that:
a) It is often conflicting.
Explanation:
If people who are fighting against you open fire and kill you, we can say you were killed by enemy fire, since it was the enemy who shot. Thus, friendly fire means being killed by your friends, not by your enemy. However, <u>when the soldier says, "I don't know why they call it friendly fire if it kills you," he is paying more attention to the literal meaning of "friendly". "Friendly" can refer to people who are nice and kind. But it can also refer to something that is not harmful. If a product does not harm nature, we say it is environment-friendly. From this perspective, it does seem weird to call "friendly fire" something that is harmful, that can kill you. Thus, to this soldier, terminology used at war seems conflicting.</u>
Answer:
By reading the second passage, the reader can better understand the first passage when they refer to children being sent to childless couples. In the first passage, the author describes everything the second passage is referring to.
Explanation:
^
I guess it is identity and finding who you really are. Please Mark Brainliest!