Disagreements regarding the legality of owning slaves were one of the fundamental causes of the Civil War. The Southern states' refusal to secede and acceptance of abolition was the only agreement that could have prevented war by that point.
What is slavery?
The practice of owning slaves is referred to as “slavery.” A person who is under the ownership and control of another instructions.
Six proposed constitutional amendments and four proposed Congressional resolutions made up the “Crittenden Compromise,” which came to be known as Crittenden's plan to pacify Southern states and prevent civil war.
Hence, the significance of the Civil War is aforementioned.
Learn more about on Civil War, here:
brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
It should be three stages
The factor that caused Jimmy Carter to be a one time president was the fact that his economic policies were ineffective.
<h3>What was the problem with the economic policy of Jimmy Carter?</h3>
The economy policies that this United States President had was known to have caused sufferings to the people of the country. This was because of the high rate of inflation that existed and the existence of very slow economic growth in the nation.
Hence the president was not reelected for another term because the people were not impressed by the way that the economy of the nation was under him.
Read more on Jimmy Carter here: brainly.com/question/25628637
#SPJ1
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
