1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ann [662]
3 years ago
9

What is the solution set -9.5 x - 1.5>-30​

Mathematics
1 answer:
zmey [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

How did you determine that? One way is to carry out the division. However, that's laborious, especially with larger numbers. A better method is to look at the denominator of the simplified fraction. From here on, we will only be working with simplified fractions of the form  

a

b

, where  

gcd

(

a

,

b

)

=

1

and  

b

>

1

. A well known fact is that if a prime  

p

|

b

where  

p

∉

{

2

,

5

}

, then the fraction is repeating. Think about why this is.

Here's a quick proof. If some fraction  

a

b

has a terminating decimal representation, then there exists a positive integer  

k

such that  

10

k

⋅

a

b

=

n

, where  

n

is a positive integer. Let  

p

be a prime factor of  

b

, and rewrite this as  

10

k

a

=

n

b

. Then  

p

|

10

k

a

, but since  

gcd

(

a

,

b

)

=

1

,  

p

∤

a

, so  

p

|

10

k

(ie:  

p

=

2

or  

5

).

We will now proceed to the main part of this lesson: repeating decimals. We will define the period of a decimal  

0.

d

1

d

2

d

3

d

4

…

to be the least positive integer  

n

such that for some integer  

k

,  

d

i

=

d

i

+

n

for all  

i

≥

k

. For example, the period of  

1

90

=

0.0

¯¯¯

1

is  

1

because for all  

i

≥

2

,  

d

i

=

d

i

+

1

=

1

. Similarly,  

1

7

=

0.

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

142857

has a period of  

6

because  

d

i

=

d

i

+

6

for all  

i

≥

1

. An intuitive way of thinking about period is that it is the number of digits in the repetend when written optimally. ("Written optimally" informally means that you should write  

0.0

¯¯¯

1

instead of  

0.0

¯¯¯¯¯¯

11

.)

You might be interested in
1. Describe how to show that triangle PMO = triangle PMN using the SSS Congruence Postulate. Then, without using a protractor, f
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

ayudenle porfa :)

Step-by-step explanation:

porfa

3 0
3 years ago
Alexi's restaurant bill is $58, and he wants to leave a 20 percent tip. Which expression represents the total amount that Alexi
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

8.00

Step-by-step explanation:

its all about moving over the decimal

8 0
3 years ago
Which is a simplified form of the expression -4(n + 1) – (n + 2)?
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

-(5 n + 6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify the following:

-4 (n + 1) - (n + 2)

-4 (n + 1) = -4 n - 4:

-4 n - 4 - (n + 2)

-(n + 2) = -n - 2:

-4 - 4 n + -n - 2

Grouping like terms, -4 - 4 n - 2 - n = (-4 n - n) + (-4 - 2):

(-4 n - n) + (-4 - 2)

-4 n - n = -5 n:

-5 n + (-4 - 2)

-4 - 2 = -(4 + 2):

-5 n + -(4 + 2)

4 + 2 = 6:

-5 n - 6

Factor -1 out of -5 n - 6:

Answer: -(5 n + 6)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the product of the integers a, b, and c is 1, then what is the difference between the largest and the smallest possible
stepladder [879]
Since there are no multiples other than 1 and -1 that could multiply in any way to equal 1, those are the only numbers you can really work with

it is a possibility that a, b, and c could equal 1 but then it would go wrong when comes time to subtract since all numbers are equal and cannot subtract largest from smallest.

a logical approach would be to try -1, -1, and 1 since -1 * -1 = 1 and then 1* 1 =1

we can make a= -1 , b= -1, and c= 1
 (we need b to equal -1 so that we get an answer of -1 opposed to if we made a=-1 and c=-1, all outcomes would equal 1)
-1²=1
-1³=-1
1⁴= 1
since 1 is the largest possible outcome and -1 is the lowest possible outcome you should subtract the two

1-(-1) = 1+1 = 2

The answer should be D: 2
 
hoped this helped at all!
5 0
3 years ago
How would we rewrite the equation of y = 1/3x -10 if we moved its graph down six units?
levacccp [35]

If you didn't change the slope of the line, but you moved it
down 6 units on the graph, then its y-intercept would become
6 less.  The equation of the new line would be ...

                  y = 1/3 x - 16 .

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • if one of a right measures 3 centimeters and the other leg measure 6 centimeter, what is the length of the hypotenuse in centime
    9·1 answer
  • In a plane, if one of two _____ lines is perpendicular to another line, the other of the two lines is perpendicular to that line
    8·1 answer
  • 9x = 5x + 4 solve for x
    5·1 answer
  • a table was sold at 20%loss but had it sold for RS 160 more these would have been a profit 20%. find cp​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the account balance?
    12·2 answers
  • Which is 1/3 + 1/4?<br><br> Plz help
    5·2 answers
  • Solve the system of equations by graphing. {y=x+1<br> y=2x
    14·1 answer
  • 12,156,2028 whats next
    5·2 answers
  • Given point P(10,10) and Q(0,4) find point R on segment PQ such that their ratio is 7:3
    7·1 answer
  • Triangle GHI is similar to triangle JKL. Find the measure of side LJ. Round your answer to the nearest tenth if necessary. Figur
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!