Answer:
protected land that only natives can live and interact on.
Explanation:
Answer:
Indian nationalism feel the movement for self-rule in later independence in the British Empire, nationalism in groups
Answer: C) Increased access to an area
Explanation:
Borders are geographic boundaries between different states. The United States, for instance, has land borders with two states: Canada and Mexico.
Countries form borders so as to determine precise boundaries between the two territories. The purpose of a border is <em>to ensure security, safety and protection</em>, but also to <u>limit the movement of people</u>, animals or goods into and out of a particular country. Therefore, increased access to an area is definitely not a reason why humans create borders, as they create them for the very opposite reason.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were two political activists who participated in the civil rights movement and fought for equal rights for African Americans and white Americans.
Another commonality between the two was the fact that they were both assassinated. Malcolm X was assassinated on February 21, 1965 in New York. He was targeted by a member of the Nation of Islam, a black supremacist organization he had belonged to. On the other hand, Martin Luther King was assassinated on April 4, 1968 in Memphis.
Upon their deaths, the immediate reaction of people was absolute shock. Many refused to believe the news, and they saw it as a direct affront to the civil rights movement. The movement continued, with many people maintaining the divisions that had been common between the two characters. However, as time passed, people eventually began to see both of them as integral parts of the movement for equal rights in the United States.
No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.