Many Native Americans (mostly Southeastern Indians/ ex. Creeks, Chickasaws, and Choctaws) supported the British in the American Revolution, while some supported the American and Spainsh (the Catawbas) because The British Empire promised to protect their land from the White American settlers if they won and fought with them, much like how Britian also promised slaves freedom if they fought for them or became spies. This was because if they won they would controll the land and the Ameircan colonies and what happens to it.
Answer: C) split custody
Explanation:Its split custody because each parents wants to gain custody of a designated child.In split custody there's no equal right to take the child because each parent would want to handle the child alone without sharing it with the other parent.In this custody system the parent has the sole custody by which the family is divided where one parent take one child and the other does the same.
In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication occurs in the nucleus during the S phase of the cell cycle. The cell's total DNA is found in the nucleus, which is why replication occurs there.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
<span>Short-term memory is the part of memory that is typically used to simply store information for a short period of time, milliseconds on average. Working memory, in comparison, allows for us to take these short-term memories, recall them, and manipulate them in ways that short-term memory is incapable of handling.</span>
