The sound argument is this one:
<span>All teachers wear vests. Mr. Gonzales does not wear a vest. Therefore, Mr. Gonzales is not a teacher.
If ALL teachers wear vests, then it means that everyone who is a teacher is wearing a vest: you can recognise a teacher by their vest. So someone who is not wearing a vest, such as Mr. Gonzales, is not a teacher.
</span>
Answer:
This is part of the lecture of the 14th Dalai Lama, the religious and political leader of the Tibetan people, Tenzin Gyatso, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989.
Explanation:
In his lecture he explains why Tibetans are happy and jovial people. It is about his cultural and religious values that stress the importance of mental peace through the generation of love and kindness to all other living sentient beings, both human and animal, but the key is really the inner peace, in that state of mind you can deal with situations with calmness and reason, while keeping your inner happiness. Without this inner peace you will be worried, disturbed or unhappy even if you have all the material things. Besides that, when we feel love and kindness towards others, it is not just good for them to feel loved, but it helps us also to develop inner happiness and peace.
Answer:
The challenges of human interactions is so important in our life it help us in developing a strength and a sense of wisdom which support us to take tough decisions in our life.
Explanation:
Human Interactions can be defined as communications between the human social order and the ecosystem. It is quite Complicated because ecosystems and human social orders have many roles and many relationships between these roles.
Human interaction is so important it is necessary for our mental well-being. Social connection helps us to cope with anxiety and major life shifts like a divorce, and moving house.
Answer:
I Believe The Answer is C on sol .
Explanation:
I hope this is correct !
The first one.
Explanation:
In this first one, the author is pulling apart what the evidence means (analysing it).
In the 2nd, it is NOT analyzing a piece of evidence specifically, it's summarizes the point and says it's supported by the evidence. So, not analyzing.
In the 3rd, the author is applying it to the situation and explaining why it's important, which is different from analysis.
In the 4th, the author is offering an example as evidence, not analyzing a piece of evidence.
