Answer:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Explanation:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law in 2008 to ensure that the discrimination against persons with disabilities in jobs, schools and all places are not found. It guarantees equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment and general accommodations. The protection this law gives to individuals is similar to that given to people based on race, gender, age and religion.
So by relieving Oscar, who has degenerative eye disease of his employment is a violation of the provisions of ADA.
Answer:
B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.
Explanation:
In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .
Answer:
the president pro Tempore is A The temperature president officer of the Senate in the absence of the vice president.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Explanation:
As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.
<em>Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was enacted to cause the colonists to pay the tax. This was represented by the stamp on various kinds of documents and papers. The colonists actually criticized the Stamp Act by calling it as taxation without representation because the government cannot generate tax without showing representation of goods and services in the Parliament. This lead to the adverse colonial reaction to this Act caused the boycott of British goods. This was also associated with the riots and attack of colonists over the tax collectors.
