Ok! let’s get this goin!
1.) There is no “actual” evidence to suggest Bigfoot actually exists or existed, if Bigfoot did exist we would at least be able to find its droppings or fossils.
2.) Bigfoot is likely a figment of people’s imaginations from rumors they heard and then thought they saw while looking at shadows in an unfamiliar area.
3.) Bigfoot is also a scary story some parents made up to scare their kids into listening to them a long time ago and some people mistook it for reality instead of myth and thought it was true.
4.) Also our current technology could’ve found Bigfoot if it were real with radar signals or heat signatures but we haven’t signifying it is simply not true (unless they have no body heat or are invisible haha)
5.) Based In rumors Bigfoot is essentially an abnormally large extremely hairy version of mankind so if they are intelligent like rumors suggest they should’ve already interacted with mankind since a long time ago which they haven’t. (n’less their just shy hahaha)
The most likely answer to this problem would be A. correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
This is on the grounds, of course, that the names utilized in the print advertisements especially to the names of the product and company are all in the standard grammar and spelling. When this is not given enough attention, it would immediately give the target audience the idea of incompetency such to an extent that it would consider the product and/or the company worthless. Having many different fonts, colors, and graphics would only create inconsistency and would irritate the audience. Spilling all the beans would only result to the diminishing of the interests of the audience. References that appeal to teenagers would be situational since it is not at all times that the target audience would be teenagers or the like.
Answer:
life, death, and man versus nature.
Explanation:
Frankenstein, by English author Mary Shelley, tells the story of a monster created by a scientist and explores themes of life, death, and man versus nature.
Answer: The second part of the argument does not follow logically from the first part.
