Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Answer:
B. Subscribers cancelling their subscriptions
Explanation:
Central Times’s business environment had suffered tremendousy in recent times with transition from newspaper publication to online journalism. As a result of this, Time's publishing company has faced many problems some of which are highlighted below: many of the newspaper subscribers have cancelled their subscription, they were losing revenue, they had to relief a third of their reporting staff primarily. However, amidst all these, <u>the primary cause of disruption to Central Times’s business environment is option B</u> (Subscribers cancelling their subscriptions). It was this problem that led to the other problems (loss of revenue, firing a third of their reporting staffs)
Answer: the answer is 90.0
Explanation:
From the question above, we are given:
G = 11
I = 4
X = M = 0
Consumption function is:
C = k + cY
Where:
k = 3
c = 0.8
The GDP of a nation is given as:
Y = C + I + G + NX
By imputing the values into the GDP equation, we have:
Y = k + cY + 4 + 11 + 0
Y = 3 + 0.8Y +15
Y - 0.8Y = 18
0.2Y = 18
Y = 90.0
I think it depends on how people think of you and how much money you get paid, but I would say being with others. Just because it said you were working as a team. I would not consider "a want" in this situation.
To attract oversea investors and working immigrants
