All categories

2 years ago

Circle T has diameters RP and QS. The measure of ∠RTQ is 12° less than the measure of ∠RTS.

Mathematics

2 answers:

madam [21]2 years ago

7 0

Answer: D. 96 is the cooorrrreccccct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2021

Rufina [12.5K]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

96 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

STR + STQ=180 degree

Substitute

x+x-12=180

2x-12=180

2x=192

x=96

You might be interested in

Assume that a randomly selected subject is given a bone density test. Those test scores are normally distributed with a mean of

jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

The "probability that a given score is less than negative 0.84" is $\\ P(z$ .

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question, we have:

The random variable is normally distributed according to a standard normal distribution, that is, a normal distribution with $\\ \mu = 0$ and $\\ \sigma = 1$ .
We are provided with a z-score of -0.84 or $\\ z = -0.84$ .

Preliminaries

A z-score is a standardized value, i.e., one that we can obtain using the next formula:

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$ [1]

Where

x is the raw value coming from a normal distribution that we want to standardize.
And we already know that $\\ \mu$ and $\\ \sigma$ are the mean and the standard deviation, respectively, of the normal distribution.

A z-score represents the distance from $\\ \mu$ in standard deviations units. When the value for z is negative, it "tells us" that the raw score is below $\\ \mu$ . Conversely, when the z-score is positive, the standardized raw score, x, is above the mean, $\\ \mu$ .

Solving the question

We already know that $\\ z = -0.84$ or that the standardized value for a raw score, x, is below $\\ \mu$ in 0.84 standard deviations.

The values for probabilities of the standard normal distribution are tabulated in the standard normal table, which is available in Statistics books or on the Internet and is generally in cumulative probabilities from negative infinity, - $\\ \infty$ , to the z-score of interest.

Well, to solve the question, we need to consult the standard normal table for $\\ z = -0.84$ . For this:

Find the cumulative standard normal table.
In the first column of the table, use -0.8 as an entry.
Then, using the first row of the table, find -0.04 (which determines the second decimal place for the z-score.)
The intersection of these two numbers "gives us" the cumulative probability for z or $\\ P(z$ .

Therefore, we obtain $\\ P(z$ for this z-score, or a slightly more than 20% (20.045%) for the "probability that a given score is less than negative 0.84".

This represent the area under the standard normal distribution, $\\ N(0,1)$ , at the left of z = -0.84.

To "draw a sketch of the region", we need to draw a normal distribution (symmetrical bell-shaped distribution), with mean that equals 0 at the middle of the distribution, $\\ \mu = 0$ , and a standard deviation that equals 1, $\\ \sigma = 1$ .

Then, divide the abscissas axis (horizontal axis) into equal parts of one standard deviation from the mean to the left (negative z-scores), and from the mean to the right (positive z-scores).

Find the place where z = -0.84 (i.e, below the mean and near to negative one standard deviation, $\\ -\sigma$ , from it). All the area to the left of this value must be shaded because it represents $\\ P(z$ and that is it.

The below graph shows the shaded area (in blue) for $\\ P(z$ for $\\ N(0,1)$ .

7 0

2 years ago

Okay so- im really stuck (help is well appreciated)

Minchanka [31]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation is x<= 5.

So 5 and all the numbers less than 5 would be an answer for x.

So you would put a closed dot on 5, because x can equal 5. Then put a line pointing right to all the numbers less than 5.

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

A store has 80 modems in its inventory, 30 coming from source a and the remainder from source

Mrrafil [7]

The number of defective modems in the inventory is 20%⋅ 30 + 8%⋅ 50 = 10 (out of 80). Note that the number of defectives in the inventory is fixed, i.e., we are not told that there is 1 8 probability that a modem in the inventory is defective, but rather that exactly 1 8 of all modems are defective. The probability that exactly two modems in a random sample of five are defective is = 0.102

5 0

2 years ago

If θ=0rad at t=0s, what is the blade's angular position at t=20s

babunello [35]

The attached figure represents the relation between ω (rpm) and t (seconds)
To find the blade's angular position in radians ⇒ ω will be converted from (rpm) to (rad/s)
              ω = 250 (rpm) = 250 * (2π/60) = (25/3)π    rad/s
              ω = 100 (rpm) = 100 * (2π/60) = (10/3)π    rad/s

and from the figure it is clear that the operation is at constant speed but with variable levels
            ⇒   ω = dθ/dt   ⇒   dθ = ω dt

            ∴    θ = ∫₀²⁰ ω dt

while ω is not fixed from (t = 0) to (t =20)
the integral will divided to 3 integrals as follow;
       ω = 0                                          from t = 0 to t = 5
       ω = 250 (rpm) = (25/3)π            from t = 5   to t = 15
       ω = 100 (rpm) = (10/3)π            from t = 15 to t = 20

∴ θ = ∫₀⁵ (0) dt   + ∫₅¹⁵ (25/3)π dt + ∫₁₅²⁰ (10/3)π dt

the first integral = 0
the second integral = (25/3)π t = (25/3)π (15-5) = (250/3)π
the third integral = (10/3)π t = (25/3)π (20-15) = (50/3)π

∴ θ = 0 + (250/3)π + (50/3)π = 100 π

while the complete revolution = 2π
so instantaneously at t = 20
∴ θ = 100 π - 50 * 2 π = 0 rad

Which mean:
the blade will be at zero position making no of revolution = (100π)/(2π) = 50

3 0

2 years ago

Which triangle is possible?

guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

(a) 3 ft, 4 ft, 5 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangle inequality requires the sum of the two short sides exceed the long side.

a) 3 ft + 4 ft = 7 ft > 5 ft . . . . . triangle is possible

b) 4 yd + 1 2/3 yd = 5 2/3 yd < 10 yd . . . . not a possible triangle

c) 3 ft + 3 ft = 6 ft < 7 ft . . . . not a possible triangle

d) 4 in + 4 in = 8 in . . . . not a possible triangle (not greater than 8 in)

The first set of side lengths can form a triangle: 3 ft, 4 ft, 5 ft.

7 0

1 year ago