Answer:
C. European nations wanted monopoly control of markets and resources
Explanation:
The nations of Europe didn't like the idea of completely free trade because it disagreed with the established monopoly they had over the market and trade with Africa and Asia. They wanted control over the goods and trade, and free trade would mean that is abolished.
<u>The other options are not true as the free trade was already a very known concept and the one that is very consistent with the capitalist theory. European nations also had plenty of goods to import from Africa and Asia, starting with materials like ivory and silk, to spices, food, etc. </u>
1a) Benefit - Life could improve. With a larger nation taking over, there will be more resources
1b) Problem - Things will change. It is impossible for life to continue as before.
2) I would rather have a protectorate rule because it would mean that my country would be able to govern itself through its own internal government (though it would still be controlled by an outside power).
<em>Good Luck!</em>
<em></em>
Spanish, Portuguese and French colonies - Catholics
English and Dutch colonies - Protestants
Answer:
Many colonies were economically more developed than they likely would have been had they not bee colonized. An example of this is India, a country which likely wouldn't be in the economic position it is today if it weren't for advances made under British rule. India would likely be even less developed than it is today and would probably be split into several if not many smaller nations/kingdoms.
