Answer:
No, none that I am aware of. In Shakespeare’s time, a tragedy meant that the main character falls from fortune to disaster, normally because of a flaw or fate. Obviously, other characters may be unharmed, or may even benefit from the protagonist’s downfall. I’m not writing to make fun of other posters, but we could as easily call the Matrix a tragedy because Agent Smith loses, or say that Titanic has a happy ending for coffin salesmen. Yes, Macduff or Fortinbras do well at the end of their plays, but they are not the protagonists.
For that reason, because a pre-modern tragedy definitionally means that the hero falls, and that’s what happens in Shakespeare’s plays, I’d say no. There are “problem” plays such as the Merchant of Venice, where the opposite happens—a comedy has a partly sad ending, with Shylock’s defeat—but again, it’s all in what the protagonist does, and Antonio (the merchant) wins at its close when his ships return
Russel D Bag_____________
The pilot's reaction was to hold the steering wheel tight and make a daring maneuver. Ollestad didn't express his concerns as he wanted to win the championship.
<h3>Why did the pilot decide to face the bad weather?</h3>
- Although the weather was not favorable, the pilot was experienced and very efficient in his profession.
- He knew what he intended to do was risky, but he felt he could handle the process.
- For this reason, upon hearing the weather information, he decided to hold on to the plane's steering wheel and dive into a risky but highly controlled and successful maneuver.
Ollestad felt very apprehensive, but he felt that it was necessary to be bold to win the championship.
With this, we can see the theme that overcoming fears can be rewarding.
More information on the theme of a story at the link:
brainly.com/question/4008478
