Restate the question
Answer the question
Cite the source
Explain
Correct? ^
Answer:
The lesson I believe the writer is trying to convey in the The L0st Dog is fairly on the nose; 'to never lose hope on something you don't know 100%. In paragraph five and six the protagonist is seen running from a group of aforementioned men, barely escaping he end up reunited with his friend Rose, ending the story with the line "[...] Never give up hope on something you haven’t found."
Now I didn't 'explain' 'cause It'd sound redundant but if you want or need to, just add on with '...which means' or '...is/that's an example of,' et cetera.
- Something along those lines at least =)
Answer:
topic sentences state the main idea.
Answer:
C. Inexplicable events are sometimes interpreted as supernatural experiences in Cuban culture.
Explanation:
Took the review EDGE 2021
The effect of the Donner party is they stopped at a better location with grazing for cattle and shops for wagon repairs. They planned on going fort Laramie but decided to stop at fort Bernard instead which is 10 miles east of fort Laramie because they were warned that Indians were fighting ahead the grazing for cattle was poor at for Laramie and they could get wagon repairs at fort Bernard.
Both authors of "In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" chose the same historical event as the setting but these books shows the World War 1 from two absolutely different points of view. "In Flanders Fields" author praises and blesses all those warriors who protected their native land fighted for it and its future generations. While reading this story you feel persuasive tone that aimed to make you feel the same. "Dulce et Decorum Est!" shows the most appalling things that happened during the War and urges us that if we had ever been through It all it would have been the worst nightmare in our life. To conclude : in the first story author eulogizes War whereas the second warns against it.
