Answer:
For this situation, the choices ought to be against the three workers. This is principally because of the way that the inability to execute the understanding will bring about the hopeless damage which can be looked by the previous managers. The odds of a material change any inconclusive time later on doesn't bring about any sort of material change.
Simultaneously, if there is an adjustment in the administration of the association, it doesn't bring about any sort of material change which can be used by somebody in that reality that the contract not to contend was revoked.
Answer:
A) 14.72 hours
B) An additional worker should be hired since the lost work time is 14.72 hours
Explanation:
Number of machines on manufacturing line = 8
percentage of machine been down = 23%
number of workers capable of running and repairing machines = 2
machine productivity ( per machine ) = 18 units/hour
overhead cost / machine = $713
hourly rate paid per worker = $15
Total number of work hours = 8 hour
A) calculate Total amount of lost worktime
= number of machines * Total number of work hours * 23%
= 8 * 8 * 23% = 14.72 hours
B) An additional worker should be hired since the lost work time is 14.72 hours
Answer:
Sarah's cheapest repayment plan is:
The standard repayment plan.
Explanation:
With the standard repayment plan, Sarah repays 120 fixed monthly installments, assuming a repayment term of 10 years. She will pay minimal interests since the standard repayment plan also offers the shortest repayment period. To minimize interest expense, Sarah should repay the unsubsidized loans before the subsidized loans. The reason is that the unsubsidized loans accrue more interest expense over their terms than the subsidized loans.
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Nominal interest rate = 5%
Deflation rate = 2 %
Real interest rate = Nominal interest rate + Deflation rate
= 5% + 2 %
= 7%
If a country is experiencing a deflation then the real interest rate is greater than the nominal interest rate.
Answer: The correct answer is "efficient".
Explanation: Economists would characterize this situation as: efficient.
There are situations in which the possibilities of utility improvement are exhausted, reaching an exact point where it is not possible to improve without losing an opportunity. Basically that is the condition posed by the existence of efficient allocation.
