There are no options given in regards to the question. I hope the answer i am going to give is the one you are looking for. According to the Seventh Amendment, people who sue companies for not paying them are guaranteed trials by the jury. This amendment is in regards to any kind of civil suits that come in front of the court.
The correct answer is C) Mores are things like saying excuse me when you need to pass someone.
<em>The sentence that is not true about mores is “mores are things like saying excuse me when you need to pass someone.” </em>
Mores are rules that society sets by tradition, beliefs or heritage. Mores are strict because they establish what is morally correct and what is not. When someone does not apply the social mores, he/she usually is criticized. Mores are considered necessary for the welfare of society, sometimes they became laws, and the violation of mores often are met with harsh penalties. But what is not true about mores is “mores are things like saying excuse me when you need to pass someone.”
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence of British Rule
August 2, 1776
The Declaration was signed today by Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin, and others. A year ago, a revolution had started. The American people want to be free from British rule and their taxes. The Declaration clearly states that we have natural rights that we are born into. The King tried to take away the rights of the people by taking away the right to bear arms and pay unfair taxes. In the Declaration it says, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." We have certain rights that British rule took from us and that is our "Unalienable rights."
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
My best guess would be "C"
Answer:
The constitutionality of the Act was challenged by states based on two main grounds: 1. The issue of individual mandate; and 2. Mandatory expansion of medicaid by states.
Explanation:
The Affordable Healthcare Act otherwise known as Obamacare was a health reform Act that came into force in 2010 under the Obama administration in the United States of America which made provision for affordable health insurance for every citizen of America, and also expanded the scope of eligibility for medicaid in the United States of America. The constitutionality/legality of the Act was challenged by a total of about 26 states of the United States of America particularly on the ground that the Act imposed sanctions on states which failed to expand the medicaid, and on the ground of individual mandate to purchase health insurance violated the original Clause.
However, concerning the issue of individual mandate to buy health insurance, the Supreme Court of America upheld the constitutionality of the ACA on the ground that the congress has the valid and constitutional power to impose tax.
On the other hand, on the issue of mandatory expansion of medicaid by states, the court stated that it was optional and not mandatory for states to chose to expand the medicaid, thereby declaring the mandatory medicaid expansion by states unconstitutional.
